Managing Implementing Partners
- Page not found
- About Us
- Civil Society Groups
- electronic Vaccine Intelligence Network
- Financial Management
- Health Information Systems
- Innovation and Technologies
- Legal and Policy Support
- Non-Communicable Diseases
- Procurement and Supply Chain Management
- Programme Management
- Solar for Health
- Frequently Asked Questions
- National Coordinating Bodies
Legal and Policy
- Case Studies
- Enabling legal environments
- Identifying human rights barriers
- Key Populations
- UNDP's role
- About results
- Arab States
- Asia Pacific
- Europe & the CIS
- Impact Highlights
- Latin America & the Caribbean
- Regional Grants
Resilient health systems are implemented through a variety of partners to ensure comprehensive service delivery. National health plans involve both government and civil society implementing in partnership to deliver on planned results.
Implementing partners (called Sub-Recipients in Global Fund programmes) require support and oversight to execute, manage and monitor their assigned roles effectively. Capacity development in managing, monitoring and verifying implementing partner activities is crucial, particularly to ensure the sustainability of the health programme, as the majority of implementing partners tend to be national entities.
Implementing partners working with Key Populations
- Support the development of Standard Operating Procedures to select, contract, manage, monitor and provide oversight to implementing partners.
- Provide technical support to orientation workshops.
- Provide capacity assessment and plan development tools.
Managing Implementing Partners
Financial management systems that:
- Correctly record all transactions and balances.
- Support the preparation of regular, reliable financial reports.
- Safeguard any assets purchased for the partner.
- Are subject to acceptable auditing arrangements.
Institutional and programmatic arrangements:
- Legal status to enter into the contract.
- Effective organizational leadership, management, transparent decision-making and accountability systems.
- Infrastructure (eg: transport) to enable programmatic monitoring in a timely and accountable manner.
- Adequate health care expertise and cross-functional expertise (finance, M&E).
Monitoring and evaluation systems that:
- Collect and record programmatic data with appropriate quality control measures.
- Support the preparation of regular reliable programmatic reports.
There should be a documented programme for each year outlining all oversight visits to verify financial and programmatic data reported.
There should be Standard Operating Procedures with supporting templates for monitoring the programme implementation, and for reviewing financial and programmatic reports for completeness and technical soundness. Oversight mechanisms should include processes for problem identification and mitigation, as well as action to solve any issues identified.
Risk management of implementing partners is a continual process – risks should be assessed and plans should be carefully documented, with responsibilities for follow-up properly assigned and monitored. For example, one way of managing risk is where implementing partners that have been assessed as having weak financial management capacity should be given smaller instalments of funds more frequently to carry out specific activities.
- Documented policies and procedures for selection of implementing partners in place.
- Up to date implementing partners agreement forms and contracts.
- Percentage of implementing partners where a capacity assessment has been conducted.
- Processes and procedures for defining capacity development plans and providing capacity development support.
- Documented policies and procedures for managing and coordinating implementing partners.
- Frequency of implementing partners plan reviews and updates.
- Ability to capture and integrate implementing partners reports into management reporting.
- Number of internal and external audits of implementing partners conducted.
Guidance & Tools
Capacity Assessment for civil society groups: